2011 SsangYong Korando vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Korando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 81 more horse power than 2011 SsangYong Korando. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2011 SsangYong Korando.
Because 2011 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2011 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 SsangYong Korando | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | SsangYong | Rover |
| Model | Korando | 75 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 256 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
