2011 SsangYong Stavic vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 SsangYong Stavic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 SsangYong Stavic would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Stavic (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (120 HP @ 1800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito weights approximately 93 kg more than 2011 SsangYong Stavic.
Because 2011 SsangYong Stavic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 SsangYong Stavic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 SsangYong Stavic (340 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito. (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2011 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito. 2011 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito has manual transmission. 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 SsangYong Stavic | 2012 Mercedes-Benz Vito | |
Make | SsangYong | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Stavic | Vito |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2696 cc | 2151 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.3 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.4 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 19.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.5 seconds | 17.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1923 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 78 L |