2011 Subaru Tribeca vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Subaru Tribeca is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Subaru Tribeca (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Tundra. (242 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Subaru Tribeca should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Tundra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 39 kg more than 2011 Subaru Tribeca.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Subaru Tribeca. (335 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Subaru Tribeca.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Subaru Tribeca | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Subaru | Toyota |
| Model | Tribeca | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 335 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1911 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4864 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1877 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1687 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2748 mm | 3270 mm |
