2011 Suzuki Equator vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2011 Suzuki Equator is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Caprice would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 194 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Suzuki Equator | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | Equator | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
