2011 Suzuki SX4 vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Suzuki SX4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Suzuki SX4 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2011 Suzuki SX4. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2011 Suzuki SX4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1044 kg more than 2011 Suzuki SX4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Suzuki SX4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (377 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Suzuki SX4. (156 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Suzuki SX4. 2013 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 2011 Suzuki SX4 has manual transmission. 2011 Suzuki SX4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Suzuki SX4 | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Suzuki | Toyota |
| Model | SX4 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 377 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1755 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1605 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 12.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |
