2011 Tata Nano vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 657 cc (3 cylinders), 1999 Mazda AZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda AZ weights approximately 150 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Tata Nano | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Tata | Mazda |
| Model | Nano | AZ |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2370 mm |
