2011 Tata Nano vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Cadillac BLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Cadillac BLS would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Tata Nano | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Tata | Cadillac |
| Model | Nano | BLS |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 89.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 58 L |
