2011 Toyota Matrix vs. 1983 Ford Laser
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Laser would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1983 Ford Laser. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Laser. (121 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Toyota Matrix | 1983 Ford Laser | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Matrix | Laser |
Year Released | 2011 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4366 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2370 mm |