2011 Toyota Matrix vs. 1989 Acura Integra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1989 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1989 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Toyota Matrix | 1989 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | Matrix | Integra |
| Year Released | 2011 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 132 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4366 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2450 mm |
