2011 Toyota Matrix vs. 1999 Honda Integra
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Honda Integra would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Honda Integra (143 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1999 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 1999 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Toyota Matrix | 1999 Honda Integra | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | Matrix | Integra |
Year Released | 2011 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4366 mm | 4525 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1325 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2620 mm |