2011 Toyota Matrix vs. 2009 Hyundai i20
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Hyundai i20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Hyundai i20 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2009 Hyundai i20. (99 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2009 Hyundai i20.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Hyundai i20. (137 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Hyundai i20.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Toyota Matrix | 2009 Hyundai i20 | |
Make | Toyota | Hyundai |
Model | Matrix | i20 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |