2011 Toyota Matrix vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo S80 would be higher. Both 2011 Toyota Matrix and 2010 Volvo S80 are equipped with a 2,400 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (217 HP) has 59 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (440 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Toyota Matrix | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Matrix | S80 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 217 HP |
| Torque | 219 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 67 L |
