2011 Volvo C30 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Tundra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 499 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo C30. 2000 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2011 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2011 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Volvo C30 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | C30 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 3270 mm |
