2011 Volvo S60 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 911 kg more than 2011 Volvo S60.
Because 2013 Cadillac SRX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo S60 (400 Nm @ 1250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac SRX. (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Volvo S60 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
Model | S60 | SRX |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 304 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 80 L |