2011 Volvo S60 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Volvo S60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Volvo S60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo S60 weights approximately 121 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo S60 (240 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-5. (203 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-5.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Volvo S60 | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | S60 | CX-5 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 203 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1864 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1483 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2776 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 56 L |