2012 Aston Martin Cygnet vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cygnet | Colt |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1300 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |