2012 Audi A3 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 680 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A3 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 6389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |
