2012 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar

To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A3 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

2012 Audi A3 1982 Nissan Pulsar
Make Audi Nissan
Model A3 Pulsar
Year Released 2012 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2000 cc 1488 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 70 HP
Torque 280 Nm 115 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type 6-speed automated manual Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1460 kg 865 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1763 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1422 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2578 mm 2420 mm