2012 Audi A3 vs. 1983 Bristol Beaufighter
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,896 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 290 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.
Because 1983 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A3 | 1983 Bristol Beaufighter | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | A3 | Beaufighter |
Year Released | 2012 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 2910 mm |