2012 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSS would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mitsubishi SSS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSS weights approximately 445 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS. (270 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A3 | 2000 Mitsubishi SSS | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A3 | SSS |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |
