2012 Audi A3 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 18 kg more than 2012 Audi A3.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A3 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | A3 | CR-V |
Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |