2012 Audi A3 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (285 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2012 Audi A3. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2012 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A3 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A3 | Savana |
Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 441 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 117 L |