2012 Audi A3 vs. 2005 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Dakota (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Audi A3. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 377 kg more than 2012 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Dakota (320 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A3 | 2005 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A3 | Dakota |
Year Released | 2012 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1837 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |