2012 Audi A3 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Audi A3 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2012 Audi A3. (140 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 200 kg more than 2012 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A3 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A3 | Equinox |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1763 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1422 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2578 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.8 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 71 L |