2012 Audi A5 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Audi A5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Audi A5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi A5 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2012 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A5 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A5 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4623 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1382 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2751 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 50 L |