2012 Audi A6 vs. 1978 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1978 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1978 Datsun 260Z.
Because 1978 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A6 | 1978 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A6 | 260Z |
Year Released | 2012 | 1978 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4135 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |