2012 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Reliant Scimitar
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1983 Reliant Scimitar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Reliant Scimitar.
Because 1983 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A6 | 1983 Reliant Scimitar | |
| Make | Audi | Reliant |
| Model | A6 | Scimitar |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 91 L |
