2012 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Jaguar XJ would be higher. Both 2012 Audi A6 and 2010 Jaguar XJ are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (237 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A6 | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A6 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 237 HP | 271 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 5252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 3157 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 82 L |
