2012 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi A6 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 242 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2700 mm |