2012 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Jaguar XF would be higher. Both 2012 Audi A6 and 2011 Jaguar XF are equipped with a 3,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 2012 Audi A6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A6 | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A6 | XF |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 271 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |
