2012 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (242 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi A6 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | ATS |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 242 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4915 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1872 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2911 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 61 L |
