2012 Audi RS3 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (252 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Cadillac CTS. (346 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi RS3 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | RS3 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 7-speed automated manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
