2012 Audi RS3 vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz V
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz V would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz V. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz V.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mercedes-Benz V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz V. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz V.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi RS3 | 2003 Mercedes-Benz V | |
| Make | Audi | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | RS3 | V |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | 7-speed automated manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
