2012 Audi RS3 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Audi RS3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Audi RS3 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (317 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi RS3 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | RS3 | ATS |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 317 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
Transmission Type | 7-speed automated manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |