2012 Audi TT vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Audi TT | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 626 |
Year Released | 2012 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4201 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1359 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2469 mm | 2520 mm |