2012 Audi TT vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (265 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 108 kg more than 2012 Audi TT.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (349 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Audi TT | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | TT | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3963 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed automated manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1648 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4199 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1349 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2469 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 87 L |
