2012 BMW 116 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 BMW 116. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 BMW 116 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 15 kg more than 2012 BMW 116.
Because 2012 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 116 (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 116 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2012 BMW 116 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | BMW | Mini |
Model | 116 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4239 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1748 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1421 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 5.4 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 47 L |