2012 BMW 535 vs. 2005 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2012 BMW 535 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Seat Alhambra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Seat Alhambra would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 535 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 535 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2005 Seat Alhambra.
Because 2012 BMW 535 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 535. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 BMW 535 | 2005 Seat Alhambra | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | 535 | Alhambra |
Year Released | 2012 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 8-speed automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4899 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1464 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2968 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 70 L |