2012 BMW 550 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 BMW 550 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 550 (400 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 550 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 550 (609 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 2012 BMW 550 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2012 BMW 550 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 550 | UTE |
Year Released | 2012 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 609 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |