2012 BMW 640 vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 640 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 BMW 640 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 640. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 BMW 640 | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 640 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2012 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89.6 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4894 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1894 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1369 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2855 mm | 2540 mm |
