2012 BMW 640 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2011 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 2011 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 640 weights approximately 46 kg more than 2011 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 640 (630 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 640 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2012 BMW 640 2011 Cadillac CTS
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 640 CTS
Year Released 2012 2011
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2993 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 311 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 630 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 1500 RPM 5700 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type 8-speed shiftable automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1744 kg
Vehicle Length 4894 mm 4859 mm
Vehicle Width 1894 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1369 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2855 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption 4.8 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 6.7 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]