2012 BMW X3 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X3 (300 HP) has 152 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2012 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X3 (406 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2012 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2012 BMW X3 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X3 | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 406 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4648 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1881 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1675 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |