2012 BMW X3 vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 BMW X3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Fisker Karma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Fisker Karma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 750 kg more than 2012 BMW X3.
Because 2012 BMW X3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 BMW X3 | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | BMW | Fisker |
| Model | X3 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4648 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1881 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1675 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 36 L |
