2012 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 BMW X5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden UTE would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X5 (400 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2008 Holden UTE. (357 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden UTE.
Because 2012 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW X5 (609 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 2012 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE. 2012 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2008 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2008 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2012 BMW X5 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | X5 | UTE |
Year Released | 2012 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 609 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
Transmission Type | 8-speed shiftable automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |