2012 Cadillac CTS-V vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 835 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Cadillac CTS-V | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS-V | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 2012 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 556 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1915 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4859 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1455 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2550 mm |