2012 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 608 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2012 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 318 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | 6-speed shiftable automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1778 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4859 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1473 mm | 1450 mm |