2012 Cadillac CTS vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Cadillac CTS | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | CTS | Epica |
Year Released | 2012 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 302 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4877 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1473 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |