2012 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Bentley Continental
To start off, 2013 Bentley Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2012 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2012 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,993 cc, 2013 Bentley Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Bentley Continental (500 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Continental should accelerate faster than 2012 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Bentley Continental weights approximately 547 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Bentley Continental is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Bentley Continental will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Bentley Continental (660 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2013 Bentley Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Cadillac CTS. 2013 Bentley Continental has automatic transmission and 2012 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2012 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Bentley Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Bentley Continental | |
| Make | Cadillac | Bentley |
| Model | CTS | Continental |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 500 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 302 Nm | 660 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | 8-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1748 kg | 2295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4877 mm | 4806 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 2227 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1473 mm | 1404 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2746 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 90 L |
