2012 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2500 (204 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B2500 (323 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Aveo | B2500 |
| Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4031 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 204 HP |
| Torque | 130 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4039 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1735 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1516 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2525 mm | 2990 mm |
