2012 Chevrolet Captiva vs. 2004 BMW Z4
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW Z4 (185 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 BMW Z4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW Z4 (245 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2004 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva.
Compare all specifications:
2012 Chevrolet Captiva | 2004 BMW Z4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Captiva | Z4 |
Year Released | 2012 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2384 cc | 2494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 245 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4673 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1849 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1756 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2707 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 55 L |